Difference between revisions of "Howard Hawks as Auteur (Discussion)"
From Screenpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search (removed groups) |
(removed questions) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Bibliography == | == Bibliography == | ||
#Andrew Sarris, ''The American Cinema'', 52-56. | #Andrew Sarris, ''The American Cinema'', 52-56. |
Revision as of 16:32, 23 February 2020
Bibliography
- Andrew Sarris, The American Cinema, 52-56.
- From Theories of Authorship, John Caughie, ed. (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981):
- Peter Wollen, "The Auteur Theory," 138-151.
- From Howard Hawks American Artist, Jim Hillier and Peter Wollen, eds., (London: British Film Institute, 1996):
- Jacques Rivette, "The Genius of Howard Hawks," 26-31.
- André Bazin, "How Could You Possibly be a Hitchcocko-Hawksian," 32-34.
- V. F. Perkins, "Hawks's Comedies," 68-71.
- Lee Russell (Peter Wollen), "Howard Hawks," 83-86.
- Naomi Wise, "The Hawksian Woman," 111-119.
- Sample "Works Cited" citation according to The Chicago Manual of Style:
- Author-Date format (or you may use the "Notes and Bibliography" format):
- In the works cited: Wise, Naomi. 1996. "The Hawksian Woman." In Howard Hawks: American Artist, edited by Jim Hillier and Peter Wollen, 111-119. London: British Film Institute.
- In the body of the essay: (Wise 1996, 112)
- Author-Date format (or you may use the "Notes and Bibliography" format):
- Sample "Works Cited" citation according to The Chicago Manual of Style: