Difference between revisions of "TV Structure (Discussion)"
From Screenpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Definitions: 2016 more groups) |
(removed RW) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
#'''Groups 1 and 5:''' Flow | #'''Groups 1 and 5:''' Flow | ||
#*Who originally articulated it? What does it mean when applied to TV? | #*Who originally articulated it? What does it mean when applied to TV? | ||
| − | |||
#'''Groups 2 and 6:''' Polysemy | #'''Groups 2 and 6:''' Polysemy | ||
#*"poly-semy" = "many meanings" | #*"poly-semy" = "many meanings" | ||
Revision as of 15:44, 23 August 2016
Definitions
- Groups 1 and 5: Flow
- Who originally articulated it? What does it mean when applied to TV?
- Groups 2 and 6: Polysemy
- "poly-semy" = "many meanings"
- We saw polysemy in action in our discussion of The Andy Griffith Show. What are some specific examples of polysemy from your own television viewing?
- What does "structured polysemy" mean?
- Group 3 and 7: Discourse
- How does theorist John Fiske use the term?
- What is an example of this, from your own television viewing?
- Group 4 and 8: Interactivity and agency
- How is Janet Murray using these terms?
- How have YouTube and Netflix affected your viewing habits?
Bibliography
- Jeremy G. Butler, Television: Critical Methods and Applications (New York: Routledge, 2012).
